AJAX File Uploads with HTML 5

I see on StackOverflow the question often how to upload a file via AJAX.  It turns out it is actually not that difficult. We utilize a solution using the Html 5 FileReader component. The idea is have the file reader read a PDF file contents, and transfer those contents to a hidden field (stored in the $hidden variable). A portion of the script we use is shown below.

$("#FileUpload").on('change', function (e) {
var $self = this;
var file = $self.files[0];

var fileReader = new FileReader();
fileReader.addEventListener('load', function () {
   var result = fileReader.result;
   $hidden.val(result);
});
fileReader.readAsDataURL(file);

$self.val('');
});

Once a file is read, it invokes the “load” event with the contents of the file; the contents of the file are then stored in a hidden field. Since the contents are in the HTML file, it’s possible then to send those HTML contents to the server, or be a part of a normal postback lifecycle.

The idea with “readAsDataURL” is it creates a URL like the following: “data:text/html,sdafadf34533543sefkafdsadf90809as8dfasdf90asdf9fsdf” where the contents of the PDF are really large. You’ll need to extend what is acceptable as a part of your content.

On the server side, the solution is as simple as splitting the contents after the first comma like:

//Strip off the "data:text/html," portion of the data URL posted back to the server
fileContents.Substring(fileContents.IndexOf(",") + 1);

This is one of many solutions; there are a wide variety of JQuery or other solutions out there.

Advertisements

Watch Your Scoping

I recently found a bug in a plugin and so I figured that would be a good time to offer a public service announcement as to why you have to be careful with scoping in JavaScript.  The plugin I’m featuring is just a quick example of the problem.  Suppose your had the following HTML snippet:


< div id="section1" class="section" >
First Button
< span id="sp1" >0< /span >
< /div >
< div id="section2" class="section" >
Second Button
< span id="sp2" >0< /span >
< /div >
< div id="section3" class="section" >
Third Button
< span id="sp3" >0< /span >
< /div >

Pretty simple. The idea of my plugin was to target the root DIV tag, and then parse down to the BUTTON and SPAN at an individual level. Now, as I think about writing this, the reality is of the situation, I should have considered the JQuery Widget API, as I think that would have been better situated for what I am about to do. I was under the gun to get this feature completed, and this solution was not optimal, but it worked and did get the job done. Anyway, the JQuery plugin is below:

$.fn.parse = function() {
  return this.each(function() {
    var spn = $(this).find("span");
    btn = $(this).find("button");
    
    btn.on("click", function(e) {
       var n = parseFloat(spn.html());
       n += 1;
       spn.html(n);
    
       btn.html(btn.html() + "(clicked)");
    });
  });
}

The idea is that the span and button are retrieved within the context of the root DIV, and when the button is clicked, both elements are updated to indicate that a click occurred. You’ll notice though, that while the span gets the proper update, the button does not (always targets the last). This is simply because the button doesn’t include “var” declaration. This means the button is scoped beyond the current context of the each() callback. Because of this, the last button was selected and thus the last button is represented in the query.

This produces the result:

jsscreenshot

Adding VAR was the immediate solution. Another reminder why you need to make sure you variables are scoped correctly.

Just to brainstorm, another solution could be to, using the current reference within the button click, access the button through the callback and even target the SPAN that way, rather than relying on variables.

You can view the Gist here.

ASP.NET MVC And Client Side Lists with Kendo

In this post, I’m going to illustrate a very simple way to create client-side list-based UI’s in ASP.NET MVC. The idea with this example is to allow the ability to add a bulk number of list items that doesn’t require constantly posting back to add additional items. In this example, we’ll use Kendo UI Core framework templating capabilities, although any templating framework will do.

To start, let’s look at a very simple model:

public  class SystemTestModel
{
   public List Entities { get; set; }
}

public class SystemListEntity
{
   public string Name { get; set; }
   public string Value { get; set; }
   public bool IsDeleted { get; set; }
}

Here we have a View Model that has a list of child items. Very simple. Notice the entity has 2 properties, and an IsDeleted property, which will be illustrated later. For this example, the controller setup is simple; it reads the form posted values and rebuilds the non-deleted ones:

public ActionResult List()
{
   var model = new SystemTestModel { Entities = new List() };
   return View(model);
}

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult List(SystemTestModel model)
{
   //Remove non-deleted records - deleted from  client
   var entities = model.Entities.Where(i => i.IsDeleted == false);

   //Save entities to DB or other work
   //Reload UI
   return View(new SystemTestModel { Entities = entities.ToList() });
}

Within the view, the Name/Value pairs are rendered

<tbody id="Grid" data-last-index="@(Model.Entities.Count - 1)">
   @for (var i = 0; i < Model.Entities.Count; i++) {
     <tr>
         <td>
            <input type="text" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].Name)" value="@Model.Entities[i].Name" />
            <input type="hidden" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].IsDeleted)" value="@Model.Entities[i].IsDeleted" />
         </td>
         <td>
            <input type="text" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].Value)" value="@Model.Entities[i].Value" />
         </td>
      </tr>
   }
</tbody>

Each server-side item is rendered using the collection-based naming syntax that MVC uses to identify collections. The name for a collection-based item looks like the server-side equivalent: Entities[X].[Field] (ie. Entities[0].Name). This is important because our client-side HTML template must do the same thing:


   <tr>
      <td>
          
          <input type="hidden" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[-99].IsDeleted)" value="@Boolean.FalseString" />
      </td>
      <td>
          <input type="text" value="#= Value #" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[-99].Value)" />
      </td>
   </tr>

Notice in the template the -99; the really neat thing about the NameFor helper is that the expression doesn’t need to be valid; -99 works and literally renders to the HTML as “Entities[-99].Name”. Notice that the script block is the same equivalent above, but will be used to render client-side additional elements. The HTML between the two doesn’t need to be exact, but similar. The view will use this template when the “Add” button is clicked.

What that really means is that the server may have rendered 2 name/value items, and the client can render additional pairs. Our approach is to ensure that we render the pairs in sequential order whether created from server or client, preserving that sequential order.

The view has an add button. The add button triggers the templating capability of kendo. The idea with the template is to get the HTML for the entry and replace the “-99” with the actual index. So if the server-side rendering produced 2 elements (using indexes 0 and 1), the client-side “Add” button generates items starting from index “2” and greater.

$(function () {
   //http://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/framework/templates/overview
   $("#NewButton").on("click", function (e) {
      var html = $("#ItemTemplate").html();
      //Get the last index, add 1 because we are adding an item at the new index
      var index = $("#Grid").data("last-index") + 1;
      $("#Grid").data("last-index", index);

      //Replace -99 with the new Index
      html = html.replace(/-99/g, index);

      //Can be used to apply data values from JS
      var template = kendo.template(html);
      var data = {}; //For now, not doing any template binding
      var content = template(data);
            
      $("#Grid").append(content);
   });
});

The first step here is get the templated HTML, and update the current index appropriately. When this UI posts back, the updated index sequence posts back the new items correctly at positions 2 and greater. When the UI reloads, we now have server-side items created from the new index, and new items can be added again.

You may have noticed the IsDeleted property; this can be used to indicate items as deleted. The UI can have a delete button, which can trigger JavaScript that can hide the entire TR tag of the item from view and update the hidden field. When posted back, a permanent delete can happen (purge from the DB if it was originally persisted).

The main goal of this approach is bulk entry of lists without having to postback to add each item, like web forms used to do.

Here is the entire View (assumes JQuery and Kendo scripts included):

@model SystemTestModel

<form action="" method="post">

   <div class="row">
      <div class="col-md-12">

         <table class="table table-bordered table-hover">
            <thead>
               <tr>
                  <th>Name
                  <th>Value
               </tr>
            </thead>
            <tbody id="Grid">
               @for (var i = 0; i < Model.Entities.Length; i++)
               {
                    <tr>
                      <td>
                         <input type="text" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].Name)" value="@Model.Entities[i].Name" />
                          <input type="hidden" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].IsDeleted)" value="@Model.Entities[i].IsDeleted" />
                        </td>
                         <td>
                             <input type="text" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[i].Value)" value="@Model.Entities[i].Value" />
                           </td>
                          </tr>

               }
            </tbody>
         </table>

      </div>
   

   <div class="row">
      <div class="col-md-12">

         <button type="submit" name="Action" value="SAVE" class="btn btn-primary">
             Save 
         </button>
         <button type="button" name="Action" value="NEW" class="btn btn-default">
             New
         </button>

      </div>
   </div>

</form>

@section scripts {
   
      <script type="text/x-kendo-template">
               <tr>
                    <td>
                        <input type="text" value="#= Name #" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[-99].Name)" />
                        <input type="hidden" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[-99].IsDeleted)" value="@Boolean.FalseString" />
                    </td>
                     <td>
                        <input type="text" value="#= Value #" name="@Html.NameFor(m => m.Entities[-99].Value)" />
                     </td>
              </tr>
      </script>

<script type="text/javascript">
      $(function () {

         //http://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/framework/templates/overview
         $("#NewButton").on("click", function (e) {
            var html = $("#ItemTemplate").html();
            //Get the last index, add 1 because we are adding an item at the new index
            var index = $("#Grid").data("last-index") + 1;
            $("#Grid").data("last-index", index);

            //Replace -99 with the new Index
            html = html.replace(/-99/g, index);

            //Can be used to apply data values from JS
            var template = kendo.template(html);
            var data = {}; //For now, not doing any template binding
            var content = template(data);
            
            $("#Grid").append(content);
         });

      });
   </script>

}

And Controller:

public class SystemListEntity
   {
      public string Name { get; set; }

      public string Value { get; set; }

      public bool IsDeleted { get; set; }

   }


    public class SystemController : BaseController
    {

         public ActionResult List()
         {
            var model = new SystemTestModel { 
                          Entities = new List<SystemListEntity>() };

            return View(model);
         }

         [HttpPost]
         public ActionResult List(SystemTestModel model)
         {
            var entities = model.Entities.Where(i => i.IsDeleted == false);

            //Save entities

            //Reload UI
            return View(new SystemTestModel { Entities = entities.ToList() });
         }
}

Adding Security To Html Helpers

I know the new MVC 5 HTML tag attributes for rendering ASP.NET widgets is all the rage, but there are a lot of useful approaches to using the server-side HTML helpers.  One simple extension method we are going to look at is adding control level security.  Often within our applications, we have a means of providing UI security at the control level.  We may, for instance, hide a control if the user doesn’t belong to a certain role.  It’s really simple to add this as an extension to IHtmlString, which is what HTML tag helpers do.  First, let’s look at how this might be used:

@Html.TextBoxFor(i => i.AccountID).IfInRole("ADMIN")

Notice how our textbox has an IsVisible method; this checks if the user is in the ADMIN role, and if so, it does the following:

public static IHtmlString IfInRole(this IHtmlString html, string role)
{
    if (HttpContext.Current == null)
       return html;

    if (HttpContext.Current.User.IsInRole(role);
       return html;
    else
       return new MvcHtmlString("");
}

In this method, if the user doesn’t have permissions, it outputs a blank string instead of the original HTML, thus providing some level of control security. We could use claims to do this, or some other security feature; it really doesn’t matter what is used behind the scenes. Also, we could also provide some default template to use if the control is hidden, as a blank space may not be optimal. This can especially be the case if you are using Twitter Bootstrap, because your form may look like:

Account @Html.TextBoxFor(i => i.AccountID, new { @class = "form-control" })

And thus a wrapper around it like:

@if (Html.IsInRole("Admin")) {
  
..
}

Or using a lambda template might be better. When there is supporting HTML wrapping the HTML Helper, showing or hiding may be a little more complicated depending on your design. I hope you see from this simple example how you can add some security features into your application using the old-school HTML helpers.

Kendo UI Core and DropDownListFor

Kendo UI Core supports data attribute initialization of its widgets. This initialization approach is largely created for it’s MVVM capabilities, but also can be used for server-side approaches too, which in turn can be used with ASP.NET MVC HTML helpers. The setup may be a little different than you are used to.

Please note: Although Telerik has MVC wrappers already created and ready for you to develop with, these come with the licensed version of the product and are not available through the Kendo UI Core license.

To begin, let’s look at how we’d setup the dropdownlist as an HTML widget without and use of the server.

<select id="reasonID" data-role="dropdownlist" data-option-label="-Select Reason-" data-value="">
  <option selected="selected" value="">-Select Reason-
  <option value="1">Entered in Error
  <option value="2">Removed
</select>

In our example, a select element with a pre-defined list of options is wrapped with the kendo dropdownlist widget. It’s initialized via the data-role attribute, indicating it’s a dropdownlist widget. Next, it defines options that the widget supports. Most of the attributes on the widget that you would configure through the JavaScript API can be defined here, but the syntax differs sometimes (for instance, the optionLabel property you would use in JS initialization is data-option-label in data attribute initialization). If you run into an issue, I was able to find what I needed online so far.

Telerik has some documentation on data attribute initialization here.

The dropdownlist widget can use a textbox as the source, and can also wire data up using JSON via local JavaScript API of via AJAX if you like. I’ve stuck with a select because I’m using the MVC DropDownListFor widget, and to get this widget to render the correct content that I needed, I had to use the following configuration:

@Html.DropDownListFor(
      i => i.ReasonTypeID,      
      Model.ReasonTypes, 
      new
      {
           data_role="dropdownlist", 
           data_option_label="-Select Reason-", 
           data_value=(Model.Receiving.ShrinkTransactionTypeID.HasValue ? Model.Receiving.ShrinkTransactionTypeID.Value.ToString() : ""), 
           style="width:100%;" })

Most of this is standard. The third parameter of DropDownListFor provides HTML attributes to the rendered select option. Here we define the role data attribute used for initialization. The next attribute defines the option label, and the data_value attribute defines the selected value, which is interesting. We already define what’s selected via the lambda expression pointing to our model. However, that’s used to render the selected attribute. What I found is that to cover all selection scenarios (including the default “Select Something” item) is to add the value attribute too, which the widget uses to perform the selection. The code above manually checks for null and converts to an empty string if no value present.

In case you didn’t notice, note how the HTML attribute use data_role, particularly the underscore. The convention that MVC uses is underscore (supported by the language), which is converted to a dash during the rendering process.

Customizing the EF Entity Templates

The nice thing about Entity Framework is that anytime you are using one of the entity template generation capabilities, they are pretty easily customizable. This, of course, means that you are NOT using the pure code-first API most likely (however, to an existing database defines a T4 template). In this blog post, we’re going to quickly update the T4 template to change the default rendering:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
    
public partial class State_LKP
{
    public int StateID { get; set; }
    public string StateCode { get; set; }
    public string StateName { get; set; }
}

To add additional information that the application can later use for metadata purposes, such as the following:

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
    
public partial class State_LKP
{
    public const string StateID_Name = "StateID";
    public int StateID { get; set; }
    
    public const int StateCode_MAX_LENGTH = 10;		
    public const string StateCode_Name = "StateCode";
    public string StateCode { get; set; }
    
    public const int StateName_MAX_LENGTH = 50;
    public const string StateName_Name = "StateName";
    public string StateName { get; set; }
}

Notice that each column has a constant defining the name, as well as a constant defining it’s max length defined in the database (if a string).

To do this, we need to open up the .tt file that generates each of the entities. In my version, around line 66, we have the following snippet.

var simpleProperties = typeMapper.GetSimpleProperties(entity);
if (simpleProperties.Any())
{
    foreach (var edmProperty in simpleProperties)
    {
#>
    <#=codeStringGenerator.Property(edmProperty)#>
<#
    }
}

Notice that this snippet loops through each of the simple properties (the properties defined one for each column) and renders out a definition (note codeStringGenerator is a class defined in the T4 template that defines all of the markup. I didn’t choose to modify that here). To add the name constants and the max length constants, the updated samples were changed to the following code sample. Comments below indicate the changes made.

var simpleProperties = typeMapper.GetSimpleProperties(entity);
if (simpleProperties.Any())
{
    //edmProperty of type EdmProperty
    foreach (var edmProperty in simpleProperties)
    {
        //Check max length - if any max length, then write out a constant
	 if(edmProperty.MaxLength.HasValue)
                {
                        #>
 
                        public const int <#= edmProperty.Name #>_MAX_LENGTH = 
                            <#= edmProperty.MaxLength.Value #>;
 
                        <#
                }	


         public const string <#= edmProperty.Name #>_Name = 
               "<#= edmProperty.Name #>";

    <#=codeStringGenerator.Property(edmProperty)#>
    <#
    }
}

Here we add constants to the output of the properties and everything generates great. You may say it would be better to use attributes; that is possible as well, but for that I’d recommend editing the CodeStringGenerator class (in the T4 template) and update the Property method directly instead.

The T4 template is available here: http://pastebin.com/42NiuwDE

Discussing ASP.NET MVC Model Binding With Hidden Data

If you have taken over an MVC application, you may have come across a dilemma like the following. Notice that in a view, within a form, you’ll see a group of hidden fields mixed in with a form like the following.

Html.HiddenFor(i => i.ContactID)
Html.HiddenFor(i => i.ContactTypeID)
Html.HiddenFor(i => i.ContactDescription)
Html.HiddenFor(i => i.ContactTypeDescription)
Html.HiddenFor(i => i.OrganizationID)

Html.LabelFor(i => i.OrganizationName, new { @class = "control-label" }) Html.TextBoxFor(i => i.OrganizationName, new { @class = "form-control" })
@* and so on *@

My example had five hidden fields, but I’ve seen a lot more. These fields are not useful to the form per se; the user doesn’t enter them. However, the information is important to the records about to be updated in the database, and thus are included in the form as hidden fields for that reason. However, another reason is it acts as a quasi-ViewState mechanism that makes it very easy to replenish the following model:

public class ContactInfoModel
{
    public int? ContactID { get; set; }

    public int? ContactTypeID { get; set; }

    public string ContactDescription { get; set; }

    public string ContactTypeDescription { get; set; }

    public int? OrganizationID { get; set; }

    public string OrganizationName { get; set; }

    /* and so on */
}

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult Contact(ContactInfoModel model)
{
 ...
}

While OrganizationName and the other unlisted properties came from the form, the first five properties (and potentially more) are stored in the hidden field. The hidden field makes it nice and easy to replenish this model, and than allow the developer to use the parameters in the post action. MVC does a very nice job posting the values back to the server and populating these properties.

However, notice I said before, that this was a ViewState-like solution? It’s not quite within the model of ViewState because all of the parameters are embedded in the form in clear text. In most systems, the user is required to login before they can ever get to a page that contains this type of information. Either way, the users have the tools (IE developer tools, Firebug) to inspect and change the values in the hidden fields if they so desired. That is where the danger can lie.

Here’s the other side of the conundrum: if we don’t reload the parameters, what do we do? If we didn’t include the hidden fields, the first five parameters are not loaded from the client and thus the model is partially replenished. In most cases, these pieces of information might not be needed anyway (with the exception of OrganizationID in our scenario).

The application can certainly requery the information it needs, but then the information gets reloaded on every postback, which can get more expensive. The application could also use Session to store the information fields too.

I’m not saying “NEVER use hidden fields”, but I’m debating the value of a large number of hidden fields for replenishing the model. I probably fit within the category of storing any relative information in Session or requerying the information from the database, depending on how much information we are talking about. What is your thoughts or preference? Using hidden fields, session, database?

Using Interfaces for ASP.NET MVC Model Binding

Sometimes you may want to support view reuse, where a partial view displays a portion of the application in a reusable fashion. Suppose you had the following entity which has a bunch of properties.

public class Customer
{
   public int CustomerID { get; set; }

   public string FirstName { get; set; }

   public string LastName { get; set; }

   public string AccountNumber { get; set; }

   .
   .
}

Suppose you wanted to use a PartialView because it was an AJAX widget with a JavaScript initialization script, and defining a reusable control made it really easy to support this. MVC defines a strongly typed model reference, so does that mean we have to bind the model directly to Customer, or define a custom type for an editor template?

We actually can use interfaces by adding the following:

public interface IAccountEntity
{
   string AccountNumber { get; set; }
}

We can define this in a partial view:

@model IAccountEntity

@Html.TextBoxFor(i => i.AccountNumber)

   $(function() {
      /* Registration Script */
   });

And then use it in our EditCustomer view, as a partial with the existing model:

@Html.Partial("EditAccountNumber", Model)

Since Model (of type Customer) is also IAccountEntity, this translates just fine with MVC. It works just as well when you use hierarchies too. For instance, Customer implements IAccountEntity, but what if we had a CustomerModel class above Customer like:

CustomerModel
     Customer : IAccountEntity
        AccountNumber

If EditCustomer view looks like the following:

@model CustomerModel
.
.

<div class="form-group">
   <label class="col-md-2 control-label">First Name</label>
   <div class="col-md-10">
       @Html.TextBoxFor(Function(i) i.Customer.FirstName)
   </div>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
   <label class="col-md-2 control-label">Last Name</label>
   <div class="col-md-10">
       @Html.TextBoxFor(Function(i) i.Customer.LastName)
   </div>
</div>
<div class="form-group">
   <label class="col-md-2 control-label">AccountNumber</label>
   <div class="col-md-10">
       @Html.Partial("EditAccountNumber", Model)
   </div>
</div>

Notice how the model is passed in directly; this won’t work for our scenario, because the EditAccountNumber expects an IAccountEntity, and requires that the partial be passed in this way:

@Html.Partial("EditAccountNumber", Model.Customer)

However, that doesn’t work for our needs, if our controller has a post operation of the following:

[HttpPost]
ActionResult Edit(CustomerModel model)
{
    if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(model.AccountNumber))
    {
      //This will always be the case, why?  See below
    }
}

Welcome to one of the challenges of MVC model binding. In the previous form, the first/last name and account number would post back to the server something like:

Customer__FirstName: BOB
Customer__LastName: SMITH
AccountNumber: ABC123

What needs to happen is the “AccountNumber” key also needs to be Customer__AccountNumber for it to successfully bind back to the server. You can add AccountNumber as a parameter to the post method, or we can add another interface that supports our hierarchy, and add this interface to the CustomerModel:

//Interface definition
public interface IAccountNumberModel
{
    IAccountNumberEntity Customer { get; set; }
}

//Update to the model class
public class CustomerModel : IAccountNumberModel
{

   public Customer Customer { get; set; }

   IAccountNumberEntity IAccountNumberModel.Customer { get; set; }

}

Here IAccountNumberModel has the same property name as CustomerModel; that’s important to make sure the model binding name structure matches. Now we can pass in the CustomerModel to the EditAccountNumber view with these modifications:

//EditAccountNumber
@model IAccountNumberModel

@Html.TextBoxFor(i => i.Customer.AccountNumber)
.
.

//EditCustomer:
.
.
@Html.Partial("EditAccountNumber", Model)

Since CustomerModel implements IAccountNumberModel, and this matches the type of model on our partial view, everything binds correctly.

Some Considerations For MVC 6 Client Attributes

One of the new features coming is the addition of Tag Helpers, which are server-side attributes that get interpreted and translated into a client-side attributes. This transforms the previous approach we used to use of the following:

@Html.ActionLink("Text", "Action", "Controller")
@* OR *@
<a href="@Url.Action("Action", "Controller")">Text</a>

Both of the above examples translate to the same result; Html.ActionLink builds a link with a single HREF attribute. One of the changes available with tag helpers is to instead use new “asp” prefixed attributes to perform the rendering:

<a asp-controller="Controller" asp-action="Action">Text</a>

These attributes get translated to a href client-side attribute with the appropriately generated URL. There are a variety of tags available that support server-side attributes, outside of the hyperlink. For instance, the form and label tags also support attributes, as well as others that you can find more at the following resources:

There is lots of good content out there on the subject already. I wanted to discuss in this post the merits of tag helpers, and discuss some of the pros and cons. Whatever is discussed with tag helpers, it’s important to remember that you can always utilize the old way of developing the user interface. To my knowledge, that isn’t going away.

It is important to remember that tag helpers are server-side; they still run server-side code, and so you cannot use asp attributes at client time. The client-side interpreters do not know of these attributes, but the server does as in this post. So if you like to use jQuery or Kendo UI templating, tag helpers won’t really give you much, as you have to render the link anyway. Now, there are server-side tricks to rendering client content that can be utilized, which I have written about in the past on this blog, and so there are ways to leverage that depending on what you are doing.

You also have to be careful which attributes you use where, as certain attributes are supported for certain tags. I haven’t found a comprehensive list yet, other than the Mikesdotnetting post. So be careful as you use new attributes to account for that. Also, some properties define expressions to the field in the model that may contain additional information. For instance, the label may support a field to grab the display information. In this case, the attribute defines the name of the field to display information for, which corresponds to the property in the model. It will be interesting to see how Tag Helpers support deep nested models, and whether we need to render names like Customers[0].FirstName when working with lists. This is one area where the old tags make it a little more clear.

These are some preliminary ideas to think about; I’m sure I’ll be amending this post as I think of other considerations after publishing this post 🙂

Xamarin Forms Threading Fun

I’ve been trying out the async/await model in Xamarin Forms, and have had trouble getting it to work. It turns out there is great challenge in ensuring everything runs on the same thread. In this I learned a few lessons:

1) Make sure that once you start an operation asynchronously, make sure everything is also called in an async fashion. For instance, I had the following call hierarchy:

async LoginButton_Click
async HandleSignInCompleted(..);
async loginService.Login(..);
async HttpClient.PostAsync(..);

It’s important to make sure everything uses the async model, rather than calling the method directly. For instance, an async method can be called directly, or the results invoked directly with the .Result property on the Task. But don’t do it! Be consistent with the async/await setup.

2) Use ConfigureAwait(false)

The Task object has a ConfigureAwait method. I had success using it by applying it EVERYWHERE, on every async operation. In my above stack trace, this looked like:

async void LoginButton_Click //Since a button callback, can't define here
    async HandleSignInCompleted(..).ConfigureAwait(false);
       async loginService.Login(..).ConfigureAwait(false);
          async HttpClient.PostAsync(..).ConfigureAwait(false);

3) UI Synchronization

In my call stack, in the HandleSignInCompleted, there was a call to:

var page = new DashboardPage();
await this.Navigation.PushAsync(newPage);

This failed with an Android error (tested on an Android device) stating that the view was modified on a different thread that the original, which makes sense since we are in the async thread. The solution to that was to wrap the call in a Device.BeginInvokeOnMainThread method call. This built up the UI for the Dashboard page in the main UI thread instead.

Device.BeginInvokeOnMainThread(() => {
var page = new DashboardPage();
await this.Navigation.PushAsync(newPage);
});

Read more about BeginInvokeOnMainThread to understand the specifics, and why it may work in some situations and not others. So far that has been the tale of my adventures in asynchronous operations in Xamarin Forms. Hopefully this might help you as you use Xamarin Forms.